Laura Owens scheduled for sentencing after four Arizona felony pleas

Sign outside the Maricopa County Superior Court South Court Tower in Phoenix — 12News / KPNX

Summary

The court docket lists sentencing for Oct. 23 at 9 a.m. Arizona time.
Owens pleaded guilty Aug. 28 to two fraud counts, perjury and taking another person's identity.
The plea leaves the judge discretion on one fraud count; no sentence is asserted here.

The scheduled hearing

Laura Michelle Owens was scheduled for sentencing Friday in Maricopa County Superior Court in Phoenix. The court's docket for case CR2025-007905-001 lists a 9 a.m. sentencing event on Oct. 23. Local station KTAR reported that the hearing was expected to run between 9 a.m. and noon. The setting is confirmed; the outcome is a separate question.^{[1] [4]}

At this update, the publicly accessible docket showed an Oct. 22 court order and a sentencing memorandum docketed Oct. 23, but no sentencing disposition or resulting term. Docket updates can lag proceedings, so the absence of an entry does not establish that nothing happened in the courtroom. A prison term, probation term or other final sentence should not be reported until verified from the court or reliable contemporaneous reporting.^[1]

What Owens admitted

The court records four guilty pleas dated Aug. 28: two counts of fraudulent schemes and artifices, one count of perjury, and one count of taking the identity of another. KTAR reported that the plea agreement calls for the other 10 counts from the 14-count case to be dismissed. Those guilty pleas establish a materially different posture from the original indictments; they do not themselves specify Friday's sentence.^{[1] [4] [5]}

According to KTAR's account of the agreement, one fraudulent-schemes count has no agreed sentencing outcome, leaving a range from probation to as much as 12 and a half years in prison for the judge to consider. The other three counts call for probation under the deal. That is a description of possible and proposed terms, not a prediction or a report that the judge imposed them.^{[4] [5]}

How the case reached court

The prosecution grew from a paternity dispute involving Clayton Echard, a former lead on 'The Bachelor.' Owens had sought child support while claiming that Echard was the father of twins, then said she had miscarried. In its May 2025 announcement of an indictment, the Maricopa County Attorney's Office alleged that investigators found an altered ultrasound image, a fabricated pregnancy video and false sworn statements. Those specific descriptions were the prosecution's allegations at indictment, not findings about every originally charged act.^[2]

Prosecutors announced another seven charges in November 2025 concerning a separate pregnancy claim involving a second man she had dated in 2021. They alleged that documents were falsified to support that claim. The two sets of accusations were ultimately addressed through the August plea, according to KTAR. This account does not identify people whose names are unnecessary to explain the case or conflate charges that were not part of the guilty pleas with convictions.^{[3] [4]}

What to watch next

The decisive update will be the judge's actual sentence and any conditions entered in the court record, including whether the open fraud count results in custody or probation. The docket already records the guilty pleas, while Friday's listed event is sentencing. Until a sentencing entry, order or reliably reported ruling is available, describing Owens as having been sentenced to a particular term would overstate what is verified.^{[1] [4]}

The case has drawn attention because of Echard's television profile, but the remaining legal decision is narrow and concrete: the penalty for the admitted offenses under the plea. Earlier announcements by prosecutors should be read in their original context as charging-stage accounts, while the current court docket controls the recorded plea status. This developing report should be updated when the court's disposition becomes available.^{[1] [2] [3] [4]}

Reporting sources

This article follows our editorial standards. To report an error, see our corrections policy.